The Hero We Didn't Know We Needed

Judge Speyer might just be the hero Canada needs right now in this insane, disturbing, and dystopian society the woke subculture is trying to force on us.

Linda Gibbons, a Canadian pro lifer, was charged with ‘interfering’ with a Toronto abortion clinic’s business.

Blocking the entrance? No.

Threatening the clients? No.

Yelling and screaming at the women and workers? No.

Physically assaulting people? No.

Vandalizing the property? No.

Nope, nada, zilch.

They’re angry at her for standing outside of the clinic while praying with a sign.

Yes.

She stood there with a sign and prayed. That was her…. Interference.

I mean, seriously, if a simple sign can complicate your business than I think the problem might actually be your business.

Not only did abortion advocates target a peaceful pro lifer for standing with a sign, their victim was a 76 year old grandma.

Honestly! What is with wokists attacking grandmas? First trampling one with a horse, now this.

Okay, so an abortion business is so unstable that a grandma holding a sign and praying quietly poses an existential threat to their order of operations. I mean, c’mon, that’s kind of crazy, isn’t it?

Look, I don’t know about you, but I’m pretty sure Canadians have bigger fish to fry. Maybe someone should tell the abortion lobby that these radical liberal policies that they’ve been hyper focused on has left many Canadians struggling to put food on the table, having to decide if they’ll buy food for their kids or if they’ll buy gas for their car so they can go to work to try to make money for food for their kids. It’s a total disaster, and I think you have to be pretty disconnected from reality to really think that a woman peacefully praying is actually a serious concern for Canadians right now.

But that’s precisely the point, isn’t it? The woke leftist agenda has completely abandoned the liberal ideals that made their party valuable in favor for this radical ‘social justice’ agenda that ultimately just leaves normal Canadians floundering in the SJW wake.

So it’s a major breath of fresh air that Judge Speyer shut the door on this bogus case.

Judge Speyer recognized that Ms. Gibbons’ peaceful protest might have upset some, and may have resulted in a patient canceling the procedure. She also acknowledged that women have a right to an abortion. However, she accurately pointed out that a woman deciding not to have an abortion because of a pro lifer’s witness is NOT criminal mischief. Honestly, it’s crazy to think that anyone would argue that such a thing could constitute criminal mischief. In my opinion, that blatant attempt at slander and libel should constitute some form of criminal mischief, but I mean, that’s just my opinion.

Judge Speyer said:

“Nor is there any evidence that Ms. Gibbons blocked or in any way obstructed the entrance to the clinic…Similarly, there is no evidence that Ms. Gibbons intimidated anyone at the clinic or approaching the clinic.”

So, the only thing that Ms. Gibbons did was stand in an open space with a sign, and abortion radicals wanted to call that criminal mischief…. That’s what Canada has come to, folks. Your tax dollars at work. You might not be able to purchase gas or heating, but at least pro abortion radicals can charge grandmas for peaceful protest.

To be brutally honest here, if I haven’t been honest enough, I would actually contend that if a patient walked away from her appointment because of something she saw on a sign, then it’s entirely possible that your patient didn’t have informed consent to begin with. Which, subsequently, would mean that you might have violated her freedom of choice by altering her free and unhindered access to all the available information.

Just a thought to consider….

Now, while I am thoroughly disgusted by the abortion lobby’s attempt to target this woman and upheave her life by putting her through a criminal trial, I am at least bolstered and encouraged to know that there’s at least some sane Judges out there to defend the rights of Canadian citizens to do simple things.

“I am not persuaded that Ms. Gibbons did anything other than attend near the clinic for the purpose of communicating information to patients, for the purpose of dissuading them from having an abortion,” the judge concluded.

Next
Next

The Truth about Amber Thurman